Human rights and international law expert Professor Hilary Charlesworth, says that Australia's appointment to the UN Human Rights Council gives the country an opportunity to examine its own human rights record.
Alun Jackson: 0422 444 067 /
Education media contact: Catriona May: (03) 8344 3357 / 0435 960 030 /
UoM media contact: Katherine Smith (03) 8344 7263/
Led by the Problem Gambling Research and Treatment Centre (PGRTC) at the University of Melbourne, with researchers from Monash and Flinders Universities, the study screened 120 help-seeking family members of problem gamblers in clinical services for both family violence and problem gambling.
Fifty three per cent of participants reported some form of family violence in the past 12 months. Victimisation was experienced by 44 per cent of those participants, and was most likely to be an outcome of gamblers’ anger brought on by immediate gambling losses and frustration.
Conversely, the perpetration of family violence was more likely to occur as a reaction to deeply-rooted and accumulated anger and mistrust, with 33 per cent of participants who reported family violence reporting perpetration. Twenty two per cent reported both victimisation and perpetration.
Parents, current and ex-partners were most likely to be both perpetrators and victims of family violence. Of the participants who were interviewed in depth, most reported that problematic gambling generally preceded the family violence.
Chief Investigator Professor Alun Jackson said the participants who reported being both a victim and a perpetrator of family violence were of particular concern.
“This behaviour can indicate displaced violence where, for example a problem gambler mother is victimised by a partner or ex-partner and in turn becomes violent with other family members, typically children,” he explained. “This is in addition to the child abuse caused directly by a violent problem gambling parent or relative.”
Professor Jackson said previous studies have focused on violence between partners.